facebook rss twitter

HP reportedly mulling another CEO change

by Scott Bicheno on 22 September 2011, 10:14

Tags: Hewlett Packard (NYSE:HPQ)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qa7dz

Add to My Vault: x

Board stupid

In the eight months from 22 February 2011 HP's share price has more than halved. The CEO of the computing giant - Leo Apotheker - has been in position for less than a year so the blame for this recent plummet falls squarely at his feet.

It looks like the HP board is thinking it made a colossal mistake in appointing Apotheker, because both ATD and Bloomberg are independently referring to inside sources for the news that it's already looking for his replacement. HP's shares jumped by over six percent once the stories broke.

One of the major causes for this share price plummet have been a sequence of disappointing results from HP over the past few months. It's unfair to blame Apotheker for too much of that as many of the contributing factors were beyond his control, such as macroeconomic instability and a PC market weakened by the rise of the tablet. In fact you could argue Apotheker has been highly proactive in trying to lessen HP's exposure to the low-margin, volatile consumer market.

While the decision to scrap Palm is understandable considering the challenges of trying to make a success of being the fifth biggest mobile platform, pulling out of the PC market when HP is the dominant player is another matter entirely. But it was the guileless, damaging way in which these moves were communicated, together with paying a massive premium for Autonomy in a big to strengthen its B2B software offering, that has drawn universal criticism.

We were at a press lunch recently and got chatting to a few analysts. They were all aghast at the way in which Apotheker handled the announcement of his plans to the public. While HP says it had to be transparent in order for conversations about the possible sale or spin-off of its PC operations to be properly conducted, the feeling is that it could have been a lot more discreet.

Both reports suggest board member Meg Whitman - the former CEO of eBay and HP board member - as a possible replacement. While Whitman has the requisite big tech company experience, eBay is primarily a consumer-facing company, so you have to wonder what use she would be at HP right now.

"Regardless of whether or not the rumour is correct, the damage has already been done. This rumour and any actual action that the board might make only reinforces that HP is a company that is in severe disarray," said Ovum chief analyst Carter Lusher.

"That the board would be considering a change in CEO less that 10 months after Apotheker took over as CEO is a damning indictment of not just the new CEO, but also the board itself. Having approved the recent strategy changes, it seems spineless for the board just a month later to be potentially jettisoning that plan and its architect.

"Rumours that former eBay CEO and current HP board member Meg Whitman might be an interim replacement for Apotheker would do little for the confidence of HP's enterprise customers. Whitman's expertise lies primarily in the consumer market, and an interim leader will just prolong the sense of uncertainty."

Apotheker's methods may well be derided, but few people question that B2B software and services are where the smart money is for HP while Apple and Google dominate the consumer tech market. Even if HP decides to hold onto its PC division, the company surely needs a CEO who can take on the likes of Oracle and Cisco if it's going to revive its fortunes. Right now it doesn't looks like Apotheker is that person.

 

UPDATE - 10:40, 22 September 2011 - While we were writing this story we found ourselves wondering whether this HP board is even worse than the Yahoo one. An article we've just read from the NYT reveals such board-level dysfunction at HP as to make Yahoo's look merely useless by comparison.

 



HEXUS Forums :: 14 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
HP's shares jumped by over six percent once the stories broke.

Well played HP insiders, well played :mrgreen:
I wish Nokia's board and shareholders would do the same.
UPDATE - 10:40, 22 September 2011 - While we were writing this story we found ourselves wondering whether this HP board is even worse than the Yahoo one. An article we've just read from the NYT reveals such board-level dysfunction at HP as to make Yahoo's look merely useless by comparison.

Brilliant!
Could HP be more clueless at the moment. I think the CEO had a sort of OK idea. PC's is such a poor business to be in for the manufacturers. However the execution of the plan was utterly terrible, the threw away good value in both WebOS and the PC side. Utterly crazy, if I was on the board I would have demanded a better plan. Once they went with it though, they have to go through with it, not start second guessing the decision.
Gordy
Could HP be more clueless at the moment. I think the CEO had a sort of OK idea. PC's is such a poor business to be in for the manufacturers. However the execution of the plan was utterly terrible, the threw away good value in both WebOS and the PC side. Utterly crazy, if I was on the board I would have demanded a better plan. Once they went with it though, they have to go through with it, not start second guessing the decision.
As you say - getting out of low/no margin PC's was probably a smart move, but the way they/he did it must be a contender for an entry in “All Time Bonehead Play” book (Ace Ventura). Maybe HP investors should be lobbying for a change in board rather than CEO?

Personally, I also think the webOS product line announcement was pretty well bungled - they should have let it run longer, and perhaps dropped the price to the point where it was pretty much break even. I'm convinced that a TouchPad at say Ā£250 would have sold reasonably. And then at least you can take an established product line out there to look for a new buyer for the group.

I'm now going to leap to Leo's defence - sure he's made some real “bonehead plays” and folks are now real confused as to what HP actually does. On the other hand, he's undoubtedly managed to increase morale from where it was under Mark Turd. And unlike that unloved and unmissed predecessor, at least Leo's making the right noises about “valuing” the HP staff. As opposed to MH, who clearly regarded staff as an uncomfortable overhead to be got rid of at the first, and every subsequent, opportunity!

My worry would be who would be a suitable successor. Scott McNealy at least has a “name”, and Sun under him did some good things in the open source line. Whether others are also seriously in the frame I don't know - just as long as they don't get the old CEO back, (as some commentators have suggested would be a good idea). Seriously I can't see how anyone could respect a boss who apparently got caught (repeatedly by all reports) fiddling expenses - if it'd been a low ranking body doing the same then they'd have been prosecuted.

But this is just my view-from-the-trenches.