facebook rss twitter

Amazon said to be considering book rental service

by Scott Bicheno on 12 September 2011, 10:44

Tags: Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qa67d

Add to My Vault: x

You don’t talk about book club

According to a report in the WSJ, Amazon is looking into the possibility of creating a new subscription book service that would allow people to access an e-book library - effectively renting the books for as long as it takes to read them.

This model would be in keeping with music libraries such as Spotify, or video rental services like Netflix. End-users would sign up for an annual subscription, and Amazon would pay rights-holders themselves from the subscription money. Commercially it also doesn't sound a million miles away from what Apple is doing with iTunes Match.

But it looks like publishers are going to take some convincing. While doing the maths to see if this is worth their while, they have to take many factors into consideration. Firstly there's the cannibalisation of existing book sales - if, say, this service eats up half their e-book sales, will they be sufficiently compensated for this?

Also, says the report, there are concerns about how this would affect their relationships with other book retailers. And then there's the fact that it costs the publisher the same to deliver an e-book for rental as it does one that has been bought, so where's the benefit - especially if books become further commoditised as a result? The only advantage comes if many more people subscribe to this service than were previously buying books.

 

 



HEXUS Forums :: 4 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Amazon is looking into the possibility of creating a new subscription book service that would allow people to access an e-book library
Great idea! :mrgreen:

Especially if they do it properly:
  • Get a good range of titles - not just the latest Dan Brown or pointless celebrity autobiography;
  • Not necessarily do it as a pay-per-read - let you borrow a certain number of books in exchange for a reasonable monthly fee (one at a time obviously!);
  • Deliver it - if possible - via the existing Kindle app. I find this quite good, and I like the idea of being able to read a book on my tablet, then continue on the smartphone app on a train/bus, etc;
and - if possible - perhaps offer a small discount if you borrow a book and subsequently decide to buy it. Maybe this would be a small incentive for the publishers - the chance of increased sales?

Personally, I'd like a scheme like this that allowed me to indulged my passions for sci-fi and thrillers, without necessarily ending up with a cupboard full of books. (Not that there's anything intrinsically wrong with that, at least until they fall out on your feet!)
Just a point against the ‘publisher’s objections' - the cost of distribution is so insignificant compared to the price of the book that it's not even worth worrying about with electronic sales. Paper sales is obviously more of an issue, but the cost with electronic sales goes towards author compensation and marketing (and a few other things) much more than to distribution, which is already handled by economies of scale. If the publishers even have any more to do with it than hand a master copy to Amazon on a silver platter.
miniyazz
Just a point against the ‘publisher’s objections' - the cost of distribution is so insignificant compared to the price of the book that it's not even worth worrying about with electronic sales. Paper sales is obviously more of an issue, but the cost with electronic sales goes towards author compensation and marketing (and a few other things) much more than to distribution, which is already handled by economies of scale. If the publishers even have any more to do with it than hand a master copy to Amazon on a silver platter.
The main point of publisher's objections is that a large part of the cost of publishing a book occurs well prior to it getting distributed, whether it be in paper or electronic form. It's in all the stages that go to prepare a book to the point where it can be published. Exactly what those are varies from book type to book type, and will be different for a cookery book to the latest number 1 best-seller, but they all have costs. Not least of these, for a ‘good’ publisher, is sales and marketing, and that can be very expensive, and a lot of it is taking place months before the book is ready to be paper-printed or e-printed, and probably, before the final manuscript even arrives from the author. It also covers sales negotiation, copy editing, design and graphics, and so on. For that reason, those costs are incurred whether a book ends up e-printed and sold, e-printed and rented out of paper-printed. So the question is, does this distribution model dilute the number of paper and/or e-sales>
Saracen
So the question is, does this distribution model dilute the number of paper and/or e-sales>
I think it's pretty much guaranteed. I'm assuming that the new Amazon system will be some sort of pay-monthly contract arrangement. In which case, I would suggest that the only folks who'll continue to buy the books outright are either the folks who aren't on the scheme or those who are fans of the author/series.

On the other hand, I'm sure that it's going to happen that someone will “borrow” a book under this scheme, read it, then subsequently decide that it's good enough to want to have permanently. I suppose it really depends on how expensive the monthly fee is - if it's too low then it'd make more sense to just slot that book into your “favourites” and borrow it whenever you fancy re-reading it, (unless there's going to be some restriction against doing that?)

My worry is that this might eat into the customer numbers at the few remaining libraries that the government hasn't managed to close. Although (cynical mode on) I'm sure we'll have some backbencher coming on the screen to say how this is a great way to enable people who can't get to a library (either because they've not got transport, or the local one is no more) to benefit from the richness of our literary heritage. :yucky: