facebook rss twitter

Social networking banned by almost half of UK companies

by Scott Bicheno on 12 May 2011, 11:38

Tags: Facebook

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qa5vn

Add to My Vault: x

Anti-social networking

A new survey of over 2,000 UK employees has revealed that 48 percent of UK businesses have banned social networking sites from the work place over the past year, and that 63 percent said their employers tried to deter them from accessing sites like Facebook and Twitter from work.

Asked why, 45 percent of respondents said their bosses ‘feared business reputation was at stake'. It's easy to see why companies would want to avoid being publicly slagged-off by their own employees, but they can just as easily do so from mobile devices, or when they get home. Furthermore most sensible employees would hesitate before doing so for fear of being sacked.

The survey was conducted by Lewis PR in partnership with HCL Technologies. "It is quite remarkable that in this day and age, many employers are still putting their employees' interests as a low priority by not allowing them to use sites like Facebook," said Vineet Nayar, CEO of HCL. "While we always advocate responsible use of social networks in the office, banning them outright will impact employees' approach to work in a negative way, having a detrimental effect on the business as a whole.

"Facebook is such a popular application that is so widely used for personal and business uses, it makes no business sense to ban it, if companies do not address this they could be at the mercy of corporate suicide. Social networking is like food and drink to Generation Y workers, they are so used to communicating in a more open and collaborative way. Therefore, forward looking companies should be aiming to encourage social media activity amongst their employees rather than stifling it."

This does seem vaguely reminiscent of the Internet bans and draconian filters of a decade ago, when companies were worried their employees spent all day surfing for naughtiness, and that would reflect badly on them. Twitter and Facebook have become an intrinsic part of most companies' communications portfolio, so it does seem a bit myopic to just ban them.

 



HEXUS Forums :: 34 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
The survey was conducted by Lewis PR in partnership with HCL Technologies. “It is quite remarkable that in this day and age, many employers are still putting their employees' interests as a low priority by not allowing them to use sites like Facebook,” said Vineet Nayar, CEO of HCL. “While we always advocate responsible use of social networks in the office, banning them outright will impact employees' approach to work in a negative way, having a detrimental effect on the business as a whole.

”Facebook is such a popular application that is so widely used for personal and business uses, it makes no business sense to ban it, if companies do not address this they could be at the mercy of corporate suicide. Social networking is like food and drink to Generation Y workers, they are so used to communicating in a more open and collaborative way. Therefore, forward looking companies should be aiming to encourage social media activity amongst their employees rather than stifling it.

Hmmm. A survey conducted by that well-known paragon of objectivity and independence, a PR company.

I may be a cynic, but that raises a couple of suspicions in my mind. First, who are their clients? Second, what are those client's interests? Third, as this is a PR company survey, who paid for it to be done?

It strikes me as not dissimilar to a PR company concluding Christmas should be banned as a result of a survey conducted in association with WUT (Worldwide Union of Turkeys).
Its blocked from use at my place of work by me. Only employees with a valid business reason to use facebook/twitter have access to the site. While we did once allow it, the amount of abuse and bandwidth used in non business web browsing meant that we had to take effect to reduce it.
Not just bandwidth, 1stRaven, but time spent facebooking instead of actually working. Most bosses would raise eyebrows if their staff were sat, in working hours, reading a novel, so why not raise eyebrows at most facebook uses too. Sounds like you have a sensible policy - access where it's needed, and otherwise, no access. But never mind facebook, the same ought to apply to any web access.
It's hardly remarkable that Facebook is commonly banned. Makes sense - ban something that will (really very little doubt about it) decrease productivity. A better policy though, perhaps, might be to ban it informally (i.e. it's not allowed but not blocked) - enabling employees to use it during breaks if they wish.
Pretty old news, its just the same policies as video sites and other adult natured sites. Social sites are no different, forums are banned a lot as well.

Bandwidth is usually the reason unless you have a HR department, then its on grounds of topic.