facebook rss twitter

Court stalls law firm’s bid to grab BT customer details

by Sarah Griffiths on 5 October 2010, 15:49

Tags: British Telecom (LON:BT.A)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qa2ex

Add to My Vault: x

BT fibre monopoly?

Meanwhile, in better news for BT, an abandoned Tory tax pledge coupled with its fibre broadband roll out plans could result in a monopoly, according to The Guardian.

A manifesto tax promise from the Conservatives that has fallen by the wayside could reportedly mean BT will become a dominant force in next generation broadband as it is ‘prohibitively expensive' for its rivals to compete in laying the new cable as they will be charged much more tax than BT.

BT has just launched a survey and competition to find out where demand is high for next generation broadband services but cynical commentators have reportedly said BT's move is a publicity stunt and a bid to dodge forced deregulation by the present government.

Back in March as part of its tech manifesto, the Tories promised to drive the adoption of fibre broadband of over 100Mbps ‘by breaking BT's local loop monopoly' and George Osborne, the then shadow chancellor, vowed the party would let BT's rival lay their own cables too.

He reportedly said: "I think the best way to deliver this is by breaking up the British Telecom monopoly at the moment, which holds back companies such as Carphone Warehouse [owner of Talk Talk] or Virgin."

However the pledge seems to have gone out the window since moving into Downing Street and plans to change taxes imposed on new fibre cables by the Valuation Office Agency (VOA) which currently favour BT over its rivals, have reportedly been thrown out.

This seems to give BT a huge advantage over its rivals as non BT firms are said to be charged  £2,000/km  of fibre optic cable plus £20 for every house attached to it outside of London, according to VOA figures. By contrast, BT is reportedly charged just £15 a km.

According to the newspaper a number of court cases have begun to challenge the VOA's approach as it favours BT so strongly.



HEXUS Forums :: 3 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
£2000 Per KM compared to £15 is ridiculas …. if thats not evidence of bias then i dont know what is …

How can they argue otherwise ?
Well at least the ACS debacle has caused people to take a step back and actually look at this process. The current standard of proof required is laughable IMHO and the system leaves the defendannt at a huge disadvantage from the get go, guilty or not. I think the courts a demonstration of exactly how unreliable a bit of malice can make an IP address for identifying someone. I blame CSI and 24 for convincing everyone an IP address is some kind of infallible, magical, crime fighting, baddie tracking bullet.

The monopoly story deserves it's own article. That's ridiculous. Can't think of much more to say about it.
hmmmm “reportedly” and “said to be”

Can I request a Citation or two?