facebook rss twitter

China tells Google to comply or else

by Scott Bicheno on 12 March 2010, 18:27

Tags: Google (NASDAQ:GOOG)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qawlf

Add to My Vault: x

Orders must be obeyed

At the start of this year, Google publicly contemplated stopping its censorship of google.cn in response to a cyber attack originating in China, targeting the Gmail accounts of some Chinese civil-rights activists.

Today, reports the beeb, minister of industry and IT Li Yizhong warned Google of the consequences of not censoring google.cn. "I hope that Google will abide and respect the Chinese government's laws and regulations," he said. "But, if you betray Chinese laws and regulations... it means that you are unfriendly, irresponsible, and you will have to pay the consequences."

"We need to preserve our nation's interest, our people's interest, we cannot be relaxed with any information that will cause harm to the stability of our society, to our system, and to the health of our under-age young people," he continued, warming to his Orwellian theme. "So, of course, what needs to be shut down will be shut down, what needs to be blocked will be blocked."

And wsj.com is reporting that Google is contemplating some kind of compromise with the Chinese, according to its ubiquitous person close to the matter. Google hasn't stopped censoring its search results in China yet, but the report reckons it might within weeks.

Google is stuck in a difficult position here. If it stops censoring entirely, the Chinese government will boot it out, however, it's becoming increasingly difficult to justify complying with Chinese censorship demands on ethical grounds.

 



HEXUS Forums :: 12 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Love Google's selective ethical standards. Invasion of privacy == ok (unless it's someone outside their company). Restricting search results != ok? Charming.
I am not surprised about China's statement, in fact, I am surprised that they took so long to publicly say it. Not that I agree with them, but I don't recall the last time the Chinese government negotiated terms. They set the term no matter who they are dealing with, and it's take it or leave it (and everyone want a piece of Chinese pie).
aidanjt
Love Google's selective ethical standards. Invasion of privacy == ok (unless it's someone outside their company). Restricting search results != ok? Charming.

Well to be fair, it was an invasion of privacy that kicked this whole thing off in the first place. The restricting of search results was fine before but google threatened to stop it in response to the hacks.
Yeah, it just looks like nothing more than a power play to me. Google is big enough to have things the Chinese government needs, at the very least popularity, already filtered and proven search, and so forth. And China provides Google with 1 billion potential adsense eyeballs. So really, all this gabbing is futile because they will come to some arrangement.

It just annoys the hell out of me when they pretend they're talking about doing this on ethical grounds. If they had ethics they wouldn't have done the censorship in the first place, or turn all their users of every app/service into nice, neat, data packaged money pouches.
Why do they even need to censor their searches?