facebook rss twitter

Samsung to develop its own mobile OS?

by Scott Bicheno on 28 August 2009, 10:34

Tags: Samsung (005935.KS)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qatqc

Add to My Vault: x

You know it makes sense

Just as there's currently a free-for-all going on in the smartphone hardware market, with new entrants NVIDIA and Intel soon to be jostling for position with incumbents like Qualcomm, Texas Instruments and Freescale, the software side of things is looking pretty wide open too.

And open is the operative (pun intended) term as Linux based operating systems are very much in vogue right now.

Yesterday, Nokia launched a new smartphone that was the first to sport the Maemo 5 operating system, designed by Nokia, but based on Linux. Soon after, telecomskorea.com reported a confirmation from Samsung's head of mobile devices design - Dong-hoon Chan - as confirming that Samsung is developing its own OS.

You need a subscription to view the full story, but we have unwiredview.com to thank for extracting the following Chang quote from the article: "As have other leading mobile phone makers, Samsung has considered the necessity of developing its own operating system. And now is the right time to realize that advancement."

The Microsoft's Windows OS is nowhere near as ubiquitous in smartphones as it is in PCs. However, smartphone makers will have learnt from the high return rates of early, Linux-based netbooks and realised they have to deliver a PC-like user experience if they want smartphones to conquer the mass market.

On the flip side, they've realised that the real money from smartphones is likely to come from the products and services people access on them. An OS designed in-house can be optimised to deliver the phone maker's own services and thus increase profitability. Additionally, we doubt any of them want Google's Android to be the dominant smartphone OS.

 



HEXUS Forums :: 4 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Dell have debunked the “high return rate” myth.

And What are we defining as “their own OS” here? The thing to remember about an OS is it's made from several parts. Samsung already have their own unifying component, a UI called TouchWiz, which they use across their entire range - meaning current Samsung phones running Linux (e.g. Tocco, Pixon) all look and behave more or less the same. TouchWiz is the bit the user sees, and they don't really care whether the kernel is Symbian or Linux… and for the underlying bits, what counts as “their own”? There's a LOT of code in common between WebOS (Palm Pre) and Maemo (Nokia N*00) including the kernel and the media framework, and some with Android too (only the kernel), so where is the line drawn on calling something “their own” and calling it “Maemo with TouchWiz instead as a GUI”?
the combination is currently a unique offering no?

OSX could hardly be called apple's if you applied that same logic, all the important bits are just BSD, with glue code to introduce the required security flaws.
TheAnimus
the combination is currently a unique offering no?

OSX could hardly be called apple's if you applied that same logic, all the important bits are just BSD, with glue code to introduce the required security flaws.

The windowing kit on Apple is unique enough - as is Android's

Maemo is a funny one right now since it uses GTK+ - yet Nokia bought Trolltech (Qt) recently
This can been seen as a good thing or bad thing.

Bad thing - do programmers need another OS to program for. With Apple, Android, Symbian and mobile windows - do we really need another one,

But if they are creating a new OS just for basic phone operations so it can be simple and quick to use then great.

I have a E71 which is brilliant, but there so many things it can so that I don't care about. I wanted a good phone that was a good phone and could do emails easily, the GPS is cool but not practical for every day use in a car.

Anyhoo, I guess we will have to wait and see.