facebook rss twitter

Group including IBM and Oracle joins EC case against Microsoft

by Scott Bicheno on 15 April 2009, 18:32

Tags: Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT), European Commission, ECIS

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qarvl

Add to My Vault: x

Feeling the pressure

The European Commission (EC) sent a statement of objections to Microsoft last January concerning the bundling of its Internet Explorer (IE) browser with its Windows operating system.

In February, the company with the most overt vested interest in curtailing IE - Mozilla, which makes rival browser Firefox - generously offered its help in the case. Then two weeks later Google - not known for its affection towards Microsoft - decided to muck in as well.

Today the consensus against Microsoft grew significantly with the addition of the European Committee for Interoperable Systems (ECIS), a non-profit organisation founded in 1989 that claims to do what it says on the tin, as an ‘interested third party' in the case.

A quick look at its membership list reveals IBM, Oracle, Nokia, Adobe and Opera among others, so that makes a pretty heavyweight list of companies now ganging up on Microsoft.

"This is an important case to ensure that browsers can compete on the merits and that consumers have a true choice in the software they use to access the World Wide Web. Smaller, more innovative browser developers need a level playing field. That is why there is such broad support for the Commission's preliminary findings of abuse," said Thomas Vinje, partner at Clifford Chance and ECIS Spokesman.

Vinje had welcomed the move on behalf of ECIS back in January and on 31 March ECIS published a document entitled ‘Microsoft - A History of Anticompetitive Behavior and Consumer Harm', but this is the first time it has offered its material help to the EC.

 



HEXUS Forums :: 15 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Seriously, WTF?. Why is it always Microsoft getting the blame on things like this? Have apple set them up as i never see them having problems like these, they dont offer IE with their macs do they? They provide safari built in so why are they not getting fined?. The EC is taking the piss and should stop it now.

How do developers of browsers make money? I really would appreciate it if someone told me this cause i dont see a way other than advertising.
Hicks12
Seriously, WTF?. Why is it always Microsoft getting the blame on things like this? Have apple set them up as i never see them having problems like these, they dont offer IE with their macs do they? They provide safari built in so why are they not getting fined?. The EC is taking the piss and should stop it now.
I think you'll find that although Safarty (I really hate that browser!) is bundled with Mac OS it's not an integral part of the operating system (any Macista's confirm this?) so if you want Firefox instead then you can ditch S completely and put it in place instead.

On the other hand, IE is pretty much integral to Windows - you can't totally remove it without various things stop working. So even if you put in Firefox etc on Windows it's always going to be a ‘poor relation’ to IE, since the latter is squirrelled into the OS in various places - hence it's not a level playing field.
Hicks12
How do developers of browsers make money? I really would appreciate it if someone told me this cause i dont see a way other than advertising.
I'm confused by this too - e.g. how do the Mozilla guys pay the bills? I know they get sponsorship, but surely this is not enough to keep them in bread, butter and beer.

I was expecting Oracle and IBM to support anti-Microsoft, after all they compete directly with MS. You probably won't see, for example, HP wade in since they don't really compete, so have nothing to gain.

Bob
Ok thanks for showing me how it actually works. I still dont see the reason to fine them, give microsoft the time to take it out in windows 7 or something and if they dont then fine them, better?.
This is just bullying. Ridiculous
I think OSX should have to do the same thing.
I also think linux distros should have more browsers in there repos.
during install of distros you should get a choice. I know you can easily remove firefox and install opera or w/e but thats not the point.
firefox doesnt suit everyone.

btw opera have made a browser for the iphone but arent allowed to release it because you arent allowed to create anything that does the same job as an application that ships with the device.
surely users should get a choice with all applications?