facebook rss twitter

Broadband sometimes slower than advertised shocker

by Scott Bicheno on 13 March 2008, 10:49

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qal76

Add to My Vault: x

‘Up to’ no good

A new survey conducted by You Gov for broadband analyst Point Topic has found that a large proportion of broadband users rarely, if ever, experience the download speeds indicated by the ‘up to’ claims that are common practice among ISPs

“Of the users who reported subscribing to an ‘up to 16 Mbps’ package, only 4% said that their connection actually provided it,” said Pamela Varley, research analyst at Point Topic.

It seems that, as promised broadband speeds go up, the chances of actually achieving them are inversely proportional. So while a 512 kbps package will deliver that speed to 72 percent of users, ‘up to’ 16 Mbps connections actually offer that speed to a feeble four percent of those expecting it.

Point Topic also devised a ratio to measure how close to delivering advertised speeds individual ISPs get. ‘This ratio shows us how the user experience relates to the advertised speeds,’ said Varley. ‘The closer it is to 1 the closer the speed the user experiences to the speed advertised.’

Of the big six, Sky scores best with a ratio of 0.79 and Orange is bottom with 0.63.

It’s just a long shot, but surely it would be fair and honest for ISPs to either change the way they advertise broadband speeds or to rewrite their contracts to allow consumers to pay ‘up to’ an agreed amount for their broadband service.



HEXUS Forums :: 13 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Crikey! I'd better check mine tonight!

Cue massive repeat debate over ‘unlimited’, advertised speeds and what's ‘fair’.
“Of the users who reported subscribing to an ‘up to 16 Mbps’ package, only 4% said that their connection actually provided it,” said Pamela Varley, research analyst at Point Topic.

as much as i dislike “up to” advertisements. i know there is a difference between poor service and just living too far from the exchange to achieve it.

this actually made me quite angry. because although my connection is brilliant, not a bad word to say with either speed or service. it would be in the “doesn't achieve” side because it “only” gets 22.5Mbps rather than the advertised 24Mbps…

what a useless, childishly analysed survey it is
How fast is your broadband?

I'm not sure that this report shows anything statistically meaningful. They point out that as you go up the speed categories (512Kbps and 1/2/4/8/16 Mbps) the variance in people achieving the maximum speed increases. So higher speed -> wider range of achievable rate, and it's hard to get 16Mbps (though they don't say if lots of people get 12-15 Mbps or not) Genius :bowdown:

If people have a problem understanding “up to” and the providers don't clearly explain their services, then rather than surveys like this perhaps they should propose some alternative pricing schemes such as “at least 4Mbps 95% of the time” or per megabyte billing. However I don't think people will like what happens to the costs of the services then.
hm for me that is simply deflecting the issue.

if you buy “upto xx speed” and u only get x speed because you are 20 miles from your local exchange, thats hardly something that you can blame on the ISP. Surely a better way to do it would be to use the BT test and just buy the package that equates to your top speed.

what REALLY frustrates is when the quality of said service fluctuates during usage. for instance if you buy a 2MB line, you should ALWAYS have 2mb down, not 2mb during 12midnight to 6am and half of that for the rest of the time due to traffic (contention ratios) kicking in…to me that is the falseness behind the advertising.
I still think the ISP have got it VERY easy with just chucking in a “up to” when they know EXACTLY where you live - they can provide you with an average speed you will get when you subscribed to them.